DOI: 10.46340/eppd.2025.12.3.2
Hanna Lavrynenko, PhD in Political Science
Borys Grinchenko Kyiv Metropolitan University, Kyiv, Ukraine
Mykola Prymush, D.Sc. in Political Science
Vasyl’ Stus Donetsk National University, Vinnytsia, Ukraine
How to cite: Lavrynenko, H., & Prymush, M. (2025). The Formation of a New World Order System and Security Architecture. Evropský politický a právní diskurz, 12, 3, 16-27. https://doi.org/10.46340/eppd.2025.12.3.2
Abstract
This paper examines the prospects for constructing a new system of world order and the potential for updating the international security system. Particular attention is given to a retrospective analysis of the development of the security architecture of the world order during different historical epochs. Well-known systems of world order are analyzed, including the Westphalian, Vienna, Versailles-Washington, and Yalta-Potsdam systems. The authors consider the historical formation and operational nature of the key elements in the architecture of the existing security model – such as the UN, NATO, CSTO, and the OSCE – and highlight the need for their reform. The main trends in the development of the modern world order are revealed. The prospects of establishing a uni-, bi-, multi-, or non-polar system are analyzed and outlined. The debatable character of the issues concerning the establishment of a new world order has been highlighted. Emphasis is placed on the absence of universally recognized leading states that could serve as future “poles of influence” within the global system. Based on statistical data concerning the military potential of the G7 and BRICS member countries, the paper substantiates the prospects of their involvement in building a renewed security architecture. The authors analyzed the potential of the most powerful states and assessed their competitiveness in the contest for global leadership. The conclusion is made that the absence of clearly defined centers of influence hinders the establishment of a new world order system and complicates the process of forming a new security architecture. Finally, the authors provide recommendations that should be considered when seeking a new balance of power and updating the international security system.
Keywords: world order, security architecture, transformation, multipolarity, conflict, international security, universalism, state, international institutions.
References
Ashford, E. & Cooper, E. (2023). Yes, the World Is Multipolar. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/10/05/usa-china-multipolar-bipolar-unipolar/
Badie, B. (2019). New Perspectives on the International Order. No Longer Alone in This World. London: Palgrave Maximilian. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-94286-5
Beckley, М. (2018). Unrivaled: Why America Will Remain the World’s Sole Superpower. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Bekkevold, Jo. I. (2023). No, the World Is Not Multipolar. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/09/22/multipolar-world-bipolar-power-geopolitics-business-strategy-china-united-states-india/
Brooks, G. S. & Wohlforth, C. W. (2023). The Myth of Multipolarity: American Power’s Staying Power. Foreign Affairs, 102(3), 76-91.
Brzezinski, Z. (1997). The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and its Geostrategic Imperatives. New York: Basic Books.
Bull, H. (1966). International Theory: The Case for a Classical Approach. World Politics, 18(3), 361-377. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009761
Bull, H. (1977). The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Bull, H. (1979). Recapturing the Just War for Political Theory. World Politics, 31(4), 588-599. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009911
Bulvinskyi, A.H. (2017). Osoblyvosti suspilno-politychnoi modernizatsii krain postradianskoho prostoru [Peculiarities of Socio-Political Modernization of the Post-Soviet Countries]. Kyiv: Institute of World History of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. [in Ukrainian].
Bunde, Т., et al. (2025). Multipolarization (Munich Security Report 2025). Munich Security Conference, Munich: February 2025. https://doi.org/10.47342/EZUC8623
Burton, J. (1972). World Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Buzan, B. & Wæver, O. (2003). Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge University Press.
Denysov, V. N. (2005). Zakhidnoievropeiskyi Soiuz [Western European Union]. Entsyklopediia istorii Ukrainy [Encyclopedia of Ukrainian History]. Kyiv: Naukova dumka. http://www.history.org.ua/?termin=Zakhidnoevrop_ sojuz [in Ukrainian].
Diurozel, Zh.-B. (1995). Istoriia dyplomatii vid 1919 roku do nashykh dniv [History of Diplomacy from 1919 to the Present Day]. Kyiv: Osnovy. [in Ukrainian].
Dzvinchuk, D.I. (2012). Pivnichnoatlantychnyi alians: istoriia, funktsii, struktura, vidnosyny z Ukrainoiu [North Atlantic Alliance: History, Functions, Structure, Relations with Ukraine]. Ivano-Frankivsk: Misto NV [in Ukrainian].
Fravel, M. T., et al. (2024). Estimating China’s Defense Spending: How to Get It Wrong (and Right). Texas National Security Review, 7(3), 40-54. https://doi.org/10.26153/tsw/54043
Fukuyama, F. (2018). Against Identity Politics: The New Tribalism and the Crisis of Democracy. Foreign Affairs, 97(5), 90-114. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44823914
Fukuyama, F. (2025). Making the World Safe for Criminals. Persuasion. https://www.persuasion.community/p/making-the-world-safe-for-criminals
Gilli, А., & Gilli, M. (2019). Why China Has Not Caught Up Yet: Military-Technological Superiority and the Limits of Imitation, Reverse Engineering, and Cyber Espionage. International Security, 43(3), 141-189. https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00337
Gilpin, R. G. (1994). War and Change in International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Græger, N., et al. (eds.) (2022). Polarity in International Relations. Past, Present, Future. Governance, Security and Development. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan Cham.
https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-05505-8
Haass, R. N. (2008). The Age of Nonpolarity: What Will Follow U.S. Dominance. Foreign Affairs, 87(3), 44-56. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20032650
Hinsley, F. H. (1973). Nationalism and the International System. Dobbs Ferry, N. Y.: Oceana Publications Inc.
Ikenberry, G. (2010). The Restructuring of the International System After the Cold War. In: Leffler, M. P. & Westad, O. A. (eds.) The Cambridge History of the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 535-556. https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521837217.026
Kausikan, В. (2023). Polarity Is What States Make of It. Foreign Affairs, 102(6), 166-168.
Keersmaeker, G. De. (2016). Polarity, Balance of Power and International Relations Theory: Post-Cold War and the 19th Century Compared. Springer International Publishing.
Khylko, M., & Khylko, О. (2024). Navigating Global South’s Ambivalent Stance on Russia-Ukraine War. Evropský politický a právní diskurz [European Political and Law Discourse], 11(4), 5-15
DOI: 10.46340/eppd.2024.11.4.1
Kissinger, H. (2017). Svitovyi poriadok. Rozdumy pro kharakter natsii v istorychnomu konteksti [World Order. Reflections on the Characters of Nations and the Course of History]. Kyiv: Nash Format [in Ukrainian].
Konstantynov, V.Yu. (2004). Orhanizatsiia dohovoru kolektyvnoi bezpeky [Organization of the Collective Security Treaty]. Ukrainska dyplomatychna entsyklopediia [Ukrainian Diplomatic Encyclopedia]. Kyiv: Znannia Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].
Krushynskyi, V.Yu., & Manzhola, V.A. (2007). Mizhnarodni vidnosyny ta svitova polityka. 1945–1980. Daty. Podii. Fakty [International Relations and World Politics. 1945-1980. Dates. Events. Facts]. Kyiv: Lybid [in Ukrainian].
Kupchan, C. (2021). Bipolarity is Back: Why It Matters. The Washington Quarterly, 44(4), 123-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2021.2020457
Lake, D.A. (2019). Hierarchy in International Relations. Cornell University Press.
Lavrynenko, H., & Donaj, Ł. (2023). Unification of Ukrainian Society in a Postwar Period as a Preventive Mechanism to Avert the Crisis of State. Przegląd Strategiczny [Strategic Review], 16, 321-331. https://doi.org/10.14746/ps.2023.1.23
Lind, J. (2024). Back to Bipolarity: How China’s Rise Transformed the Balance of Power. International Security, 49(2), 7-55. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00494
Melnykova, I.M. (2004). Varshavskyi dohovir 1955 [Warsaw Pact 1955]. In: Smolii, V. A. Et al. (ed.) Entsyklopediia istorii Ukrainy [Encyclopedia of Ukrainian History]. Kyiv: Naukova dumka. http://www.history.org.ua/?termin=Varshavskyj_dohovir_1955 [in Ukrainian].
NATO (2024). NATO Member Countries. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_52044.htm
Northedge, F.S., & Grieve, M.J. (1972). A Hundred Years of International Relations. New York: Praeger.
OSCE (2005). CSCE/OSCE Key Documents. https://www.osce.org/resources/csce-osce-key-documents
Pavlenko, A.M. (2005). Varshavskyi dohovir [Warsaw Pact]. In: Editors: Dziuba, I. М. et al. Encyclopedia of Modern Ukraine. Kyiv: The NASU Institute of Encyclopedic Research. https://esu.com.ua/article-33231
Prymush, M.V. (2006). Konfliktolohiia [Conflictology]. Kyiv: Profesional. [in Ukrainian].
Rothschild, E. (1995). What Is Security? Daedalus, 124(3), 53-98. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20027310
Rubio, М. (2024). The World China Made: “Made in China 2025” Nine Years Later. Project for Strong Labor Markets and National Development The Office of Senator Marco Rubio. https://perma.cc/Q2DK-G825
Shemshuchenko, Yu. S. (2001). Konventsiia z prymyrennia ta arbitrazhu v ramkakh OBSЕ 1992 [Convention on Conciliation and Arbitration within the OSCE Framework 1992]. Yurydychna entsyklopediia [Legal Encyclopedia]. Kyiv: Ukrainian Encyclopedia M. P. Bazhan. [in Ukrainian].
Scholz, О. (2023). The Global Zeitenwende: How to Avoid a New Cold War in a Multipolar Era. Foreign Affairs, 102(1), 22-38, 36. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/germany/olaf-scholz-global-zeitenwende-how-avoid-new-cold-war
Shumskyi, I.K. (2020). Vestfalska systema yak vytok novomodernoi systemy mizhnarodnykh vidnosyn [The Westphalian System as a Turning Point in the New Modern System of International Relations]. Almanakh mizhnarodnoho prava [Almanac of International Law]. http://inlawalmanac.mgu.od.ua/v23/12.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Sørensen, G. (2006). What Kind of World Order?: The International System in the New Millennium. Cooperation and Conflict, 41(4), 343-363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836706069601
Sytnyk, H.P. & Orel, M.H. (eds.) (2021). Natsionalna bezpeka v konteksti yevropeiskoi intehratsii Ukrainy [National Security in the Context of Ukraine’s European Integration]. Kyiv: MAUP. https://ipacs.knu.ua/pages/dop/336/files/7148e643-1410-42f1-a6b6-f4cf15aeb638.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Taran, Ye.I. (2022). Henezys systemy svitovoho poriadku [The Genesis of the World Order System]. Naukovi perspektyvy [Scientific Perspectives], 7. https://doi.org/10.52058/2708-7530-2022-7(25)-190-199 [in Ukrainian].
Taran, Ye.I., & Popov, M.A. (2023). Formuvannia novykh tsentriv vplyvu v umovakh stanovlennia novoho svitovoho poriadku [Formation of New Centers of Influence in the Context of the Emergence of a New World Order]. Politychni naslidky viiny rosiiskoi federatsii proty Ukrainy ta shliakhy yikh podolannia: materialy naukovo-praktychnoho seminaru [Political Consequences of the War of the russian federation against Ukraine and Ways to Overcome Them: Materials of the Scientific and Practical Seminar]. Kyiv: KNU. [in Ukrainian].
The White House (2022). National Security Strategy. Washington, DC. https://perma.cc/7RPC-7HZJ
Tunsjø, Ø. (2018). The Return of Bipolarity in World Politics. New York City: Columbia University Press.
United Nations (2021). History of the United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/history-of-the-un
Waltz, K. N. (1967). Foreign Policy and Democratic Politics: The American and British Experience. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of International Politics. United Kingdom: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Walzer, M. (1977). Just and Unjust Wars. A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. New York: Basic Books.
Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is What States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391-425. doi:10.1017/S0020818300027764
Wolfers, A. (1962). Diskort and Collaboration, Essays on International Politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
