DOI: 10.46340/eppd.2026.13.2.1
Dmytro Yagunov, Attorney at Law, D.Sc. in Political Science, Ph.D. in Public Administration, MSSc in Criminal Justice, Associate Professor, Merited Lawyer of Ukraine
Eberhard Karls University, Vasyl Stus Donetsk National University
How to cite: Yagunov, D. (2025). The Punitive Cell: Solitary Confinement at the Intersection of Criminology, Law, and Human Rights. Evropský politický a právní diskurz, 13, 2, 5-44. https://doi.org/10.46340/eppd.2026.13.2.1
Abstract
Solitary confinement – the isolation of a prisoner from meaningful human contact for twenty-two or more hours per day – remains one of the most institutionally resilient practices in contemporary penology. This article proceeds from a methodological repositioning: the question of whether solitary confinement is harmful has been definitively resolved. Its destructive impact upon physical and mental health, its failure to achieve any declared penological objective, and its role in provoking self-harm, suicide, and psychological disintegration constitute an empirical axiom. The central inquiry shifts to the structural: why, despite more than a century of clinical and criminological evidence, does solitary confinement remain embedded in prison systems worldwide?
The article integrates doctrinal analysis of ECtHR jurisprudence and CPT standards and reports, empirical synthesis across criminology and psychiatry, comparative legislative analysis across multiple jurisdictions, and critical-theoretical interpretation drawing on Foucault, Cohen, and Bauman. It reconstructs the normative architecture governing isolation – including the CPT’s PLANN framework and the doctrinal arc from Ramirez Sanchez v. France (2006) to the structural incompatibility principle in Schmidt and Šmigol v. Estonia (2023) – situating this within the logic of carceral power.
Three undeclared functions sustain the practice: neutralisation of surplus populations, disciplinary terror as a mechanism of internal governance, and symbolic affirmation of state sovereignty. The article also analyses terminological substitution as a structural evasion mechanism, informal prison hierarchies in post-Soviet and comparable systems, and the political economy of punishment as an obstacle to reform. It concludes that solitary confinement persists not because it is effective, but because it is institutionally convenient – as a disciplinary instrument, a political symbol, and a substitute for systemic reform deferred by resource constraints and electoral calculation.
Keywords: solitary confinement, isolation in detention, penology, carceral state, social control, informal prison hierarchies, vulnerable populations, recidivism, political economy of punishment, prison reform.
References
Barkway, K., & Turcotte, A. (2022). Solitary Confinement in British Columbia, Canada. In: Shalev, S. Mapping Solitary Confinement. www.solitaryconfinement.org/_files/ugd/Mapping-Solitary-Confinement-Canada-British-Columbia.pdf
Biggs, B. S. (2009). Solitary Confinement: A Brief History (From Quaker Logic to America’s First Electric Chair, A Quick Tour of Prisons Past). Mother Jones. www.motherjones.com/politics/2009/03/solitary-confinement-brief-natural-history/
Blackwell, C. (2025). A Brief History of Solitary Confinement in America. Jewish Currents.
https://jewishcurrents.org/a-brief-history-of-solitary-confinement-in-america
Blanc, J.-S. (2019). United States: Does Solitary Confinement Make Inmates More Likely to Reoffend? Prison Insider.
www.prison-insider.com/en/articles/united-states-does-solitary-confinement-make-inmates-more-likely-to-reoffend
Brox, J. (2023). The Silent Treatment: Solitary Confinement’s Unlikely Origins. The Public Domain Review.
https://publicdomainreview.org/essay/silent-treatment/
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (2026). Restricted Housing. Division of Adult Institutions (DAI).
www.cdcr.ca.gov/adult-operations/restricted-housing
Clark, A. (2017). Juvenile Solitary Confinement as a Form of Child Abuse. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 45(3), 350-357.
Clark, V., & Duwe, G. (2019). From Solitary to the Streets: The Effect of Restrictive Housing on Recidivism. Corrections, 4(4), 235-251.
Cohen, F. (2008). Penal Isolation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 1017-1047.
College of Family Physicians of Canada (2012). Solitary Confinement. Position Statement.
www.cfpc.ca/CFPC/media/Resources/Prison-Health/2012-12-Solitary-Confinement-EN-FINAL.pdf
Correctional Service Canada (2021). Structured Intervention Units: Overview.
www.canada.ca/en/correctional-service/corporate/library/offenders/structured-intervention-units/overview.html
Council of Europe (2003a). CPT Report on Bosnia and Herzegovina. https://www.coe.int/en/web/cpt/bosnia-and-herzegovina
Council of Europe (2003b). CPT Report on Croatia. https://rm.coe.int/168069555e
Council of Europe (2004). CPT Report on Cyprus. https://rm.coe.int/1680695598
Council of Europe (2005a). CPT Report on Albania. https://www.coe.int/en/web/cpt/albania
Council of Europe (2005b). CPT Report on Turkey. https://rm.coe.int/168069824a
Council of Europe (2006). CPT Report on Armenia. https://rm.coe.int/168066d074
Council of Europe (2007a). CPT Report on the Netherlands (Aruba). https://rm.coe.int/1680697831
Council of Europe (2007b). CPT Report on Switzerland. https://www.coe.int/en/web/cpt/switzerland
Council of Europe (2008a). CPT Report on Finland.
https://www.coe.int/en/web/cpt/-/council-of-europe-anti-torture-committee-publishes-report-on-finla-1
Council of Europe (2008b). CPT Report on the UK.
https://www.coe.int/fi/web/cpt/-/council-of-europe-anti-torture-committee-publishes-report-on-the-united-kingdom
Council of Europe (2009a). CPT Report on Greece. https://www.coe.int/en/web/cpt/greece
Council of Europe (2009b). CPT Report on Hungary.
https://www.coe.int/en/web/cpt/-/council-of-europe-anti-torture-committee-publishes-report-on-hunga-2
Council of Europe (2011). CPT Report on Switzerland.
https://www.coe.int/en/web/cpt/-/council-of-europe-anti-torture-committee-publishes-report-on-switzerla-1
Council of Europe (2012a). CPT Report on Italy. https://rm.coe.int/168069727a
Council of Europe (2012b). CPT Report on Russian Federation. https://rm.coe.int/1680697bd6
Council of Europe (2013a). CPT Report on Germany. https://www.coe.int/en/web/cpt/germany
Council of Europe (2013b). CPT Report on Hungary. https://rm.coe.int/1680696b7f
Council of Europe (2013c). CPT Report on Portugal. https://rm.coe.int/16806979c5
Council of Europe (2013b). CPT Report on Turkey.
https://www.coe.int/en/web/portal/news-2013/-/asset_publisher/TEHtOeUO1Ozc/content/anti-torture-committee-publishes-report-on-turkey
Council of Europe (2014a). CPT Report on Denmark.
https://www.coe.int/en/web/cpt/-/council-of-europe-anti-torture-committee-publishes-report-on-denmark
Council of Europe (2014b). CPT Report on North Macedonia. https://www.coe.int/en/web/cpt/north-macedonia
Council of Europe (2015). CPT Report on Germany. https://www.coe.int/en/web/cpt/germany
Council of Europe (2017). CPT Report on Estonia. https://www.coe.int/en/web/cpt/estonia
Council of Europe (2018). CPT Report on Hungary. https://rm.coe.int/16808d6f12
Council of Europe (2019a). CPT Report on Italy. https://rm.coe.int/16809986b6
Council of Europe (2019b). CPT Report on Russian Federation.
https://www.coe.int/en/web/portal/home/-/asset_publisher/CWAECqDHgT3y/content/anti-torture-committee-publishes-report-on-russian-federati-1
Council of Europe (2019c). CPT Report on United Kingdom.
https://www.coe.int/en/web/cpt/-/council-of-europe-anti-torture-committee-publishes-report-on-the-united-kingdom-focusing-on-scottish-prisons
Council of Europe (2019d). Norway Should Improve the Situation for Prisoners in Solitary Confinement.
www.coe.int/en/web/cpt/-/norway-should-improve-the-situation-for-prisoners-in-solitary-confinement
Council of Europe (2024). CPT Report on Czechia.
https://www.coe.int/en/web/cpt/-/council-of-europe-anti-torture-committee-cpt-publishes-report-on-its-2024-periodic-visit-to-czechia
Dube, P. (2017). Ontario Prisons Use Solitary Confinement Too Often and for The Wrong Reasons. Ombudsman Ontario.
www.ombudsman.on.ca/en/news/speeches-and-articles/ontario-prisons-use-solitary-confinement-too-often-and-wrong-reasons-tvo
European Committee for the Prevention of Torture (2025). Informal Prisoner Hierarchy: Prison Standard CPT/Inf.
https://rm.coe.int/1680b57a6a
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (2023). Germany – Solitary Confinement. Anti-Muslim Hatred Database.
https://fra.europa.eu/en/databases/anti-muslim-hatred/node/7897
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (2024). Criminal Detention Conditions – Bulgaria.
https://fra.europa.eu/en/databases/criminal-detention/node/7867
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (2025). Criminal Detention in the EU: Conditions and Monitoring – United Kingdom: England and Wales.
https://fra.europa.eu/en/databases/criminal-detention/node/8117
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (2026). Criminal Detention Conditions – Croatia: 1. National standard, 1.1. Minimum space. FRA – European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. https://fra.europa.eu/en/databases/criminal-detention/node/7967
Federal Bureau of Prisons (2024). Special Housing Units (Program Statement 5270.12). U.S. Department of Justice.
www.bop.gov/policy/progstat/5270.12.pdf
Gallagher, L. (2014). More Than a Time Out: Juvenile Solitary Confinement. UC Davis Journal of Juvenile Law & Policy, 18(2), 244-266.
Ghafar, M. (2017). Exiting Solitary Confinement: A Survey of State Correctional Policies. UCLA Law Review, 64(2).
Goodman, C., et al. (2022). Solitary Confinement: From Its Origins to Reparations For Its Survivors. University of North Carolina School of Law Human Rights Policy Lab. https://law.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/solitaryconfinementreparations.pdf
Grassian, S. (1983). Psychopathological Effects of Solitary Confinement. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 140(11), 1450-1454.
Haney, C. (2019). Solitary Confinement, Loneliness, and Psychological Harm. In: J. Lobel & P. Scharff Smith (eds.) Solitary Confinement: Effects, Practices, and Pathways Toward Reform. University of California Press, 129-152.
Haney, C., & Lynch, M. (1997). Regulating Prisons of the Future: A Psychological Analysis of Supermax and Solitary Confinement. N.Y.U. Review of Law & Social Change, 23(4), 477-570.
Harrington, M. (2015). Methodological Challenges to the Study and Understanding of Solitary Confinement. Federal Probation, 79(3), 45-47.
Henry, B. (2022). Disparities in Use of Disciplinary Solitary Confinement by Mental Health Diagnosis, Race, Sexual Orientation and Sex: Results From a National Survey in the United States of America. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 32(2), 114-123.
HM Inspectorate of Prisons (2023). Isolation in Detention: A Thematic Review.
https://cdn.websitebuilder.service.justice.gov.uk/uploads/sites/23/2023/07/Isolation-in-Detention.pdf
James, K., & Vanko, E. (2021). The Impacts of Solitary Confinement. Evidence Brief. Vera Institute of Justice.
https://vera-institute.files.svdcdn.com/production/downloads/publications/the-impacts-of-solitary-confinement.pdf
Labrecque, R. (2015). The Effect of Solitary Confinement on Institutional Misconduct: A Longitudinal Evaluation. Publication No. 249013. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Cincinnati: ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
LeMasters, K., et al. (2025). The Use of Solitary Confinement and in-Custody Mortality in North Carolina State Prisons, 2021–2023. SSM – Population Health, 32, 101865.
Luigi, M., et al. (2022). Solitary Confinement of Inmates Associated With Relapse Into Any Recidivism Including Violent Crime: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 23(2), 444-456.
Madrid v. Gomez, 889 F. Supp. 1146 (N.D. Cal. 1995).
https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/889/1146/1904317
Martynowicz, A., & Moore, L. (2018). ‘Behind the Door’: Solitary Confinement in the Irish Penal System. Irish Penal Reform Trust. www.iprt.ie/site/assets/files/6439/solitary_confinement_web.pdf
Medley, Petitioner, 134 U.S. 160 (1890).
Messina v. Italy (No. 2). App. No. 25498/94 (ECHR 2000).
Morris, R. (2015). Exploring the Effect of Exposure to Short-Term Solitary Confinement Among Violent Prison Inmates. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 32, 10.
National Institute of Justice (2016). Restrictive Housing in the U.S.: Issues, Challenges, and Future Directions. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs. www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/249013.pdf
New York Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (2014). The Solitary Confinement of Youth in New York: A Civil Rights Violation. U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. December.
Penal Reform International (2022). Deaths in Prison: Examining Causes, Responses, and Prevention of Deaths in Prison Worldwide. December.
https://cdn.penalreform.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Deaths-in-prison-briefing.pdf
Public Safety Canada (2024). Solitary Confinement and the Structured Intervention Units in Canada’s Penitentiaries: The Final Report of the SIU IAP. December 5. www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/2024-siu-iap-sltry-cnfnmnt/index-en.aspx
Pullen-Blasnik, H., et al. (2021). The Population Prevalence of Solitary Confinement. Science Advances, 7(48).
Ramirez Sanchez v. France [GC], No. 59450/00, ECHR 2006-IX (July 4, 2006).
Reiter, K. (2018). The International Persistence and Resilience of Solitary Confinement. Oñati Socio-legal Series, 8(2), 247-266.
Rubin, A. (2021). Solitary Confinement in Nineteenth-Century Prisons. Fifteeneightyfour: Academic Perspectives from Cambridge University Press. February 25.
https://cambridgeblog.org/2021/02/solitary-confinement-in-nineteenth-century-prisons/
Rubin, A., & Reiter, K. (2018). Continuity in the Face of Penal Innovation: Revisiting the History of American Solitary Confinement. Law & Social Inquiry, 43(4), 1604-1632.
Segregated Confinement, Assemb. B. 280, 2023-2024 Reg. Sess. (Cal. 2023).
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billCompareClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240AB280
Shalev, S. (2008). A Sourcebook on Solitary Confinement. Mannheim Centre for Criminology: London School of Economics and Political Science.
Shalev, S. (2022). 30 Years of Solitary Confinement: What Has Changed, and What Still Needs to Happen. Torture Journal, 32(1-2).
Silverthorn, R., & Zgoba, K. (2024). Unlocking the Truth: Exploring the Impacts of Solitary Confinement on Recidivism and the Need for Mental Health Support for Individuals With Mental Illnesses. American Journal Of Criminal Justice, 49(1).
Smith, P. (2019). Solitary Confinement – Effects and Practices from the Nineteenth Century until Today. In: Lobel, J., & Smith, P.S., Solitary Confinement. Effects, Practices, and Pathways Toward Reform. Oxford University Press, 21-42.
Sokalska, O. (2025). Penitentiary Systems Evolution in the Context of Corrective Punishment Ideas Development (16th – early 19th centuries). Publish Pro. https://doi.org/10.33663/978-617-8247-76-8
Solitary Watch (2023). Solitary Confinement and Prison Safety (Fact Sheet No. 4). February.
https://solitarywatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/SW-Fact-Sheet-4-Prison-Safety-v230228.pdf
Solitary Watch (2025). Frequently Asked Questions About Solitary Confinement.
https://solitarywatch.org/facts/faq
Solitary Watch (2026). Fact Sheet: Solitary Confinement and the Law.
https://solitarywatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/FACT-SHEET-Solitary-Confinement-and-the-Law1.pdf
South Africa (1998). Correctional Services Act 111 of 1998. Government Gazette. www.gov.za/documents/correctional-services-act
Strafvollzugsgesetz (1976). [StVollzG]. www.gesetze-im-internet.de/stvollzg/__89.html
Strong, J., et al. (2020). The Body in Isolation: The Physical Health Impacts of Incarceration in Solitary Confinement. National Library of Medicine, 15(10). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7546459
Students for Prison Education, Abolition, and Reform (2026). Facts About Solitary Confinement. www.princetonspear.com/7×9-fact-sheet
The International Psychological Trauma Symposium (2007). The Istanbul Statement on the Use And Effects of Solitary Confinement. International Psychological Trauma Symposium. December 9. www.solitaryconfinement.org/_files/ugd/Istanbul\_expert\_statement\_on\_sc.pdf
The Prison Rules (1999). England and Wales (SI 1999/728). www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1999/728/article/45/made
UN Committee against Torture (2017). Concluding Observations on the Second Periodic Report of Ireland. Geneva: UN CAT.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (2011). Handbook on Dynamic Security and Prison Intelligence. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. www.unodc.org/documents/justice-and-prison-reform/UNODC_Handbook_on_Dynamic_Security_and_Prison_Intelligence.pdf
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (2015). United Nations Standard Minimum Rules
for the Treatment of Prisoners (The Nelson Mandela Rules).
www.unodc.org/documents/justice-and-prison-reform/Nelson_Mandela_Rules-E-ebook.pdf
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (2016). Handbook on the Management of High-Risk Prisoners (Criminal Justice Handbook Series). www.unodc.org/documents/justice-and-prison-reform/HB_on_High_Risk_Prisoners_Ebook_appr.pdf
United Nations, General Assembly (2011). Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment: Interim Report of the Special Rapporteur on Torture (A/66/268). August 5. https://undocs.org/en/A/66/268
Weinreich, S. (2022). Slow Tampering: A History of Solitary Confinement: Doctoral Dissertation. Princeton University. http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp019306t2530
Yagunov, D. (2010). Crisis of the Rehabilitation Ideal in the Research of Robert Martinson and Its Significance for the Modern Penal Policy. South Ukrainian Law Journal, 4, 28-30.
Yagunov, D. (2023). A Simulacrum of Prison Subculture in the Practices of the European Court of Human Rights and the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture. Evropský politický a právní diskurz [European Political and Law Discourse], 10(2), 13-32.
