DOI: 10.46340/eppd.2024.11.2.4
Ilona Mishchenko, PhD in Law
National University “Odesa Law Academy”, Odesa, Ukraine
How to cite: Mishchenko, I. (2024). The Changing Role of Non-preferential Origin of Goods in World Trade: the Case of the EU. Evropský politický a právní diskurz, 11, 2, 40-50. https://doi.org/10.46340/eppd.2024.11.2.4
Abstract
The article examines the issue of non-preferential origin and its role in world trade. It argues that all the instruments used in international trade based on non-preferential origin have different effects on such trade – traditionally negative or restrictive, neutral in terms of not affecting the geography and volume of trade, and positive in terms of achieving certain sustainable development objectives. The latter is rather unclear, so the focus here is on this aspect. Contrary to the prevailing view that only preferential origin, which allows for the application of preferential treatment, is intended to promote and facilitate international trade, it is argued that instruments applied on the basis of non-preferential origin can also have a positive, albeit non-economic, effect. Using the example of the European Union’s trade and customs policies, the paper examines the connection between the non-preferential origin of goods and the solution of such global problems of humanity as the use of forced and child labour, the appropriation of resources and products produced in territories occupied or annexed by aggressor countries and the illegal trade in such goods, the carbonisation of the economy and illegal deforestation. In particular, it is noted that the mechanism of operation of such instruments is linked to additional bans and restrictions on trade in goods originating from problematic territories (annexed or occupied territories, territories where forced labour is used, illegal deforestation, etc.). However, such bans and restrictions contribute to reducing the scale of negative processes through their economic impact on the country in which they occur. It should be noted that the positive impact of such measures is greater the more countries around the world implement them and join in the common contribution to sustainable development.
Keywords: non-preferential origin, sustainable development, deep origin, trade defence measures, EU trade and customs policy, most favoured nation treatment.
References
Amnesty International (2021). “Like We Were Enemies in a War”: China’s Mass Internment, Torture and Persecution of Muslims in Xinjiang. https://web.archive.org/web/20240415024922/https://xinjiang.amnesty.org/
Azzam, M. W. (2019). Harmonization of Non-Preferential Rules of Origin. Global Trade and Customs Journal, 10(14), 467-469. https://doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2019056
Brenton, P. (2011). Preferential Rules of Origin. Preferential Trade Agreement Policies for Development, 161-177. https://doi.org/10.1596/9780821386439_CH08
Cadot, O., Carrere, C., De Melo, J. & Tumurchudur, B. (2006). Product-Specific Rules of Origin in EU and US Preferential Trading Arrangements: an Assessment. World Trade Review, 5(2),199-224. https://doi:10.1017/S1474745606002758
Congressional Research Service (2005, December, 15). Normal-Trade-Relations (Most-Favored-Nation) Policy of the United States. https://web.archive.org/web/20240209171452/https://www.everycrsreport.com/files/20051215_RL31558_8600c4dcebded883cd8887acd107db3bcaa49f84.pdf
Council of the European Communities (1987). Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the Tariff and Statistical Nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 256, 7.9.1987, 1-675. https://web.archive.org/web/20240430100009/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/1987/2658/oj
Das, G. (2023). CJEU Invalidates Non-Preferential Rules of Origin – A Ray of Hope for Indian Exporters of Seamless Stainless-Steel Pipes and Tubes to EU. Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan Attorneys. https://web.archive.org/web/20240407133012/https://www.lakshmisri.com/insights/articles/cjeu-invalidates-non-preferential-rules-of-origin-a-ray-of-hope-for-indian-exporters-of-seamless-stainless-steel-pipes-and-tubes-to-eu/
Donner, A. M. (2013). Preferential Rules of Origin in Regional Trade Agreements. Staff Working Paper ERSD. https://web.archive.org/web/20240421191149/https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/ersd201305_e.pdf
East Asia Forum (2023, June, 12). The Risks and Rewards of Economic Sanctions https://web.archive.org/web/20240407141848/https://eastasiaforum.org/2023/06/12/the-risks-and-rewards-of-economic-sanctions/
Employment and Social Development Canada (2019). Labour Exploitation in Global Supply Chains: What We Heard Report. https://web.archive.org/web/20230519214159/https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/esdc-edsc/documents/programs/international-affairs/reports/what-we-heard-forced-labour-global-supply-chain/Forced_Labour_WWHR(EN)-v2.pdf
European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights (2021, September, 05). Forced Labor of Uyghurs: German Textile Brands and Retailers Allegedly Complicit in Crimes Against Humanity. https://web.archive.org/web/20240109010147/https://www.ecchr.eu/en/press-release/forced-labor-uyghurs-german-textile-brands/
European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights (2022, May, 05). Adidas, Hugo Boss, Puma and Co.: Sourcing Cotton Produced With Forced Labor? https://web.archive.org/web/20230330134752/https://www.ecchr.eu/en/press-release/cotton-xingjang-forced-labor/
European Commission (2024a). Trade Defence Investigations. Ongoing Investigations. https://web.archive.org/web/20240329082100/https://tron.trade.ec.europa.eu/investigations/ongoing
European Commission (2024b). Access2Markets. Trade Barriers. https://web.archive.org/web/20240430104959/https://trade.ec.europa.eu/access-to-markets/en/barriers/details?isSps=false&barrier_id=10066
European Commission (2024c). TARIC Measure Information. https://web.archive.org/web/20240430100543/https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/dds2/taric/measures.jsp?Lang=en&SimDate=20240217&Area=&MeasType=&StartPub=&EndPub=&MeasText=&GoodsText=&op=&Taric=61122000&AdditionalCode=&search_text=goods&textSearch=&LangDescr=en&OrderNum=&Regulation=&measStartDat=&measEndDat=&DatePicker=17-02-2024
European Commission (2024d). Negotiations and Agreements. https://web.archive.org/web/20240327200526/https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/eu-trade-relationships-country-and-region/negotiations-and-agreements_en
European Council (2014). Council Regulation (EU) No 692/2014 of 23 June 2014 Concerning Restrictive Measures in Response to the Illegal Annexation of Crimea and Sevastopol. Official Journal, L 183 24.6.2014, 9. https://web.archive.org/web/20231223000100/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02014R0692-20221006
European Council (2022). Council Regulation (EU) 2022/263 of 23 February 2022 Concerning Restrictive Measures in Response to the Illegal Recognition, Occupation or Annexation by the Russian Federation of Certain
Non-Government Controlled Areas of Ukraine. Official Journal, L 042I 23.2.2022, 77. https://web.archive.org/web/20230603021227/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02022R0263-20221007
European Council (2023a). Regulation (EU) 2023/956 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 May 2023 Establishing a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism. Official Journal, L 130, 16.5.2023, 52-104. https://web.archive.org/web/20240315020815/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/956/oj
European Council (2023b). Regulation (EU) 2023/1115 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 2023 on the Making Available on the Union Market and the Export from the Union of Certain Commodities and Products Associated with Deforestation and Forest Degradation and Repealing Regulation (EU) No 995/2010. Official Journal, L 150, 9.6.2023, 206-247. https://web.archive.org/web/20240426115409/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32023R1115&qid=1687867231461
European Parliament (2022). Prohibiting Products Made with Forced Labour on the Union Market 2022/0269(COD). https://web.archive.org/web/20240430105558/https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/ficheprocedure.do?lang=en&reference=2022/0269
Government of Canada (2023). Fighting Against Forced Labour and Child Labour in Supply Chains Act. https://web.archive.org/web/20240404175527/https://laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/F-10.6/
Group of Experts on Action Against Trafficking in Human Beings (2017). Human Trafficking for the Purpose of Labour Exploitation. https://web.archive.org/web/20221230094250/https://rm.coe.int/labour-exploitation-thematic-chapter-7th-general-report-en/16809ce2e7
Gwardzińska, E. & Chowaniec J. (2022). Application of the European Union (EU) Non-Preferential Rules of Origin for Goods as a Measure to Extend the Scope of Trade Restrictions. World Customs Journal, 16(1), 37-48. https://web.archive.org/web/20240430110047/https://worldcustomsjournal.org/Archives/Volume%2016%2C%20Number%201%20(Mar%202022)/1930%2001%20WCJ%20v16n1%20Gwardzinka%20%26%20Chowaniec.pdf
Hirsch, M. (2002). Rules of Origin as Trade or Foreign Policy Instruments? The European Union Policy on Products Manufactured in the Settlements in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. Fordham International Law Journal, 26 (3), 572-594. https://web.archive.org/web/20231113171713/https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1879&context=ilj
Hoekman, B. & Inama, S. (2018). Harmonization of Rules of Origin: An Agenda for Plurilateral Cooperation? East Asian Economic Review, 22(1), 3-28. https://dx.doi.org/10.11644/KIEP.EAER.2018.22.1.336
Holly, G. & Feld, L. (2023). Setting the Scene For an Effective Forced Labour Ban in the EU. The Danish Institute for Human Rights. Copenhagen. https://web.archive.org/web/20240316074243/https://www.humanrights.dk/ files/media/document/SETTING%20THE%20SCENE%20FOR%20AN%20EFFECTIVE%20FORCED%20LABOUR%20BAN%20IN%20THE%20EU_accessible.pdf
International Labour Organization. Walk Free. International Organization for Migration (2022, September). Global Estimates of Modern Slavery. Forced Labour and Forced Marriage. https://web.archive.org/web/20240411034151/https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—ed_norm/—ipec/documents/publication/wcms_854733.pdf
Kalashlinska, M. (2023). Stvorennya efektyvnykh mekhanizmiv pidtrymky bizhentsiv v Lyublini (Polshcha): dosvid ta perspektyvy [Creating Effective Mechanisms for Refugee Support in Lublin (Poland): Experience and Prospects]. Evropský Politický a Právní Diskurz [European Political and Law Discourse], 10(2), 43-52. https://doi.org/10.46340/eppd.2023.10.2.4 [in Ukrainian].
Kanevskaia, O. (2023). WTO Rules for Trade with Disputed Territories. Journal of International Economic Law, 26(3), 397-415. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgad015
Koval, N. O. (2019). Pravyla vyznachennia nepreferentsiinoho pokhodzhennia tovaru vidpovidno do mytnoho kodeksu Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu [The Rules for Determining the Non-Preferential Origin of Goods in Accordance with the Customs Code of the European Union]. Lex Portus, 1, 24-35. https://doi.org/10.26886/2524-101X.1.2019.2 [in Ukrainian].
Muñiz, P. (2015). Preferential Origin Disputes: Is the Good Faith Defence under EU Law Being Eroded? Global Trade and Customs Journal, 11(10), 368-379. https://doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2015045
Office of the Director of National Intelligence (2023, June). Assessment of Impact of Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine on Food Security. https://files.constantcontact.com/fab49a91901/1e86de0d-671c-4652-9c56-dec0554e13a2.pdf
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (2008, June). Forced LabourForced Labour and Trafficking in Persons. https://web.archive.org/web/20231113204119/https://www.oecd.org/dac/gender-development/44896368.pdf
Pathak, S. (2018). From Strategic Trade to Weaponization of Trade. IndraStra Global, 4(5), 1-4. https://web.archive.org/web/20240430112036/https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/57155
Reinsch, W. A. (2021). Weaponizing Trade. Center for Strategic and International Studies. https://web.archive.org/web/20240328150227/https://www.csis.org/analysis/weaponizing-trade
Revis, J. F., Huenges Wajer, J. & Kooke, E. (2023, October, 11). EU Court of Justice Concludes that the European Commission has Exceeded its Powers when Adopting Delegated Legislation Concerning Non-Preferential Rules of Origin. A Blog by Baker McKenzie. https://web.archive.org/web/20240407132810/https://www.internationaltradecomplianceupdate.com/2023/10/11/eu-court-of-justice-concludes-that-the-european-commission-has-exceeded-its-powers-when-adopting-delegated-legislation-concerning-non-preferential-rules-of-origin/
Sakalauskas, J. (2023). Harley-Davidson Case Highlights Limits of Binding Origin Information in Union Customs Law. Customs Compliance & Risk Management Journal, 20, 34-35. https://web.archive.org/web/20240430113308/https://www.customsclearance.net/files/journal-release-translations/296/CCRM%2020%20free.pdf
Satta, T. (2019). Non-Preferential Origin and ‘Made in Italy’. Global Trade and Customs Journal, 10(14), 458-461. https://doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2019054
Staples, B. (2023). Thoughts on Non-Preferential & Deep origin. Customs Compliance & Risk Management Journal, 23, 52-55. https://web.archive.org/web/20240430113517/https://www.customsclearance.net/files/journal-release-translations/306/CCRM%2023%20free.pdf
Tanaka, A. (2011). World Trends in Preferential Origin Certification and Verification. WCO Research Paper, 20. https://web.archive.org/web/20231015074529/https://www.wcoomd.org//media/wco/public/global/pdf/topics/research/research-paper-series/20_preforigin_worldtrends_tanaka_en.pdf
The Office of the Law Revision Counsel (2024). U.S. Code. Title 19 Customs Duties. http://uscode.house.gov/browse/prelim@title19&edition=prelim
U.S. Congress (2021, December, 23). Public Law 117 – 78 – An Act to Ensure that Goods Made with Forced Labor in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of the People’s Republic of China do not Enter the United States Market, and for Other Purposes. https://web.archive.org/web/20240130192346/https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/PLAW-117publ78/
U.S. Department of Labor (2022). 2022 List of Goods Produced by Child Labor or Forced Labor. https://web.archive.org/web/20240421104534/https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ILAB/child_labor_reports/tda2021/2022-TVPRA-List-of-Goods-v3.pdf
Ujiie, T. (2006, December). Rules of Origin: Conceptual Explorations and Lessons from the Generalized System of Preferences. ERD Working Paper Series, 89. https://web.archive.org/web/20230607015654/https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/28206/wp089.pdf
Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2015, December, 25). Law of Ukraine on Public Procurement. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/922-19?lang=en#Text
Vermulst, E. A. (1992). Rules of Origin As Commercial Policy Instruments? – Revisited. Journal of World Trade, 26 (6), 61-102. https://doi.org/10.54648/trad1992042
Wegnez, A. M. (2019). The Origin of Goods in International Trade, an Often Misunderstood Concept Which is However an Important Trade Issue. Global Trade and Customs Journal, 14 (10), 442-450. https://doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2019052
World Customs Organisation (1947). The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT 1947). https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/gatt47_01_e.htm
World Trade Organisation (1994). Agreement on Rules of Origin.
https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/22-roo_e.htm
