DOI: 10.46340/eppd.2024.11.2.1
Olga Brusylovska, ScD in Political Science
Odesa I. I. Mechnikov National University, Odesa, Ukraine
Iuliia Maistrenko, PhD in Political Science
Odesa I. I. Mechnikov National University, Odesa, Ukraine
How to cite: Brusylovska, O. & Maistrenko, Iu. (2024). Russia’s Regional Policy: Unlearned Lessons of Local Conflicts. Evropský politický a právní diskurz, 11, 2, 5-15. https://doi.org/10.46340/eppd.2024.11.2.1
Abstract
The goal of this article is to identify Russia’s policy options during local conflicts in the post-Soviet space. Our research is empirical. The research question is how Russia chose its “involvement” options in post-Soviet local conflicts? The independent variable is Russian regional politics; the dependent variable is local conflict in a post-Soviet country (cases of Abkhazia, South Ossetia, Nagorno-Karabakh, and Chechnya). The hypothesis is that Russian politics played a significant role in post-Soviet local conflicts. Research triangulation was achieved through the use of several qualitative methods (documentary investigation, collecting data from media and secondary sources, Internet research, and discourse analysis). The first option of Russia’s actions in the post-Soviet space is to fuel a local conflict and play the role of a “Peacemaker” to solidify its influence in the region. Russia employed such tactics in Nagorno-Karabakh, Abkhazia, and South Ossetia in the initial stage. The second option is “Invasion and the Creation of Quasi-States,” which was applied in Chechnya, as well as in Abkhazia and South Ossetia after the Five-Day War against Georgia. A similar attempt was made in Ukraine under the project “Novorossiya,” but it ended with limited success. Instead of a quasi-state stretching upon the entire southeastern part of Ukraine (Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, Mykolaiv, Odesa, Kharkiv, Kherson regions, and Crimea), the Kremlin managed to create only “the Donetsk and Luhansk People’s Republics” (DPR and LPR), while Crimea, due to its special military-strategic value, was annexed by the Russian Federation through a rigged referendum. By using local conflicts, Russia seeks to regain its status as a great power. To achieve this, Russia plays out the same scenario in the post-Soviet space: igniting ethnic tensions, deploying a limited contingent, and endorsing territorial changes in favor of allies. The same instruments were applied again in Ukraine, but the international community failed to learn the lessons from previous conflicts and was unable to stop Putin before the onset of large-scale aggression.
Keywords: Russia, regional politics, local conflicts, Abkhazia, South Ossetia, Nagorno-Karabakh, Chechnya, quasi-states.
References
Baev, Р. (2023, September 30). The Next Surge of Conflict in the South Caucasus is Still Preventable. IFRI. https://www.ifri.org/sites/default/files/atoms/files/baev_conflict_south_caucasus_2023.pdf
Chowdhury, A., & Chandra Shil, N. (2021). Thinking ‘Qualitative’ Through a Case Study: Homework for a Researcher. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 5(2), 190-210. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/11280
Commonspace.eu. (2020, November 10). Document: Full Text of the Agreement between the Leaders of Russia, Armenia and Azerbaijan. https://web.archive.org/web/20240417184244/https://www.commonspace.eu/news/document-full-text-agreement-between-leaders-russia-armenia-and-azerbaijan
Coombs, H. (2022). Case Study Research: Single or Multiple [White Paper]. Southern Utah University. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7604301
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Los Angeles: SAGE.
De Waal, T. (2017, January 24). The Threat of a Karabakh Conflict in 2017. Carnegie Centre. https://web.archive.org/web/20240417183447/https://carnegieeurope.eu/strategiceurope/?fa=67774
Esipov, V. (2020, November 21). Jeksperty o situacii v Karabahe: mir s daleko idushhimi posledstvijami
[Experts on the Situation in Karabakh: Peace with Far-reaching Consequences]. DW. https://web.archive.org/web/20240417184602/https://www.dw.com/ru/jeksperty-o-situacii-v-karabahe-mir-s-daleko-idushhimi-posledstvijami/a-55678239 [in Russian].
Fedorov, Ju. (2016). «Hybrid» War A LA RUSSE: Gibridnaja vojna po-russki [“Hybrid” War A LA RUSSE: Hybrid War in Russian]. Kyiv: Biznespoligraf. [in Russian].
Gadimova, G. S. K. (2018). The Impact of the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict on the Regional Prosperity
of the South Caucasus. New Eastern Europe. https://web.archive.org/web/20240417180520/https://neweasterneurope.eu/2018/04/23/impact-nagorno-karabakh-conflict-regional-prosperity-south-caucasus/
Gonchar, M. (2016). Gibressija Putina. Nevoennye aspekty vojn novogo pokolenija [Putin’s Hybridization.
Non-military Aspects of New Generation Wars]. Kyiv: Centr Globalistiki Strategija HHІ. https://web.archive.org/web/20240417182444/https://ivinas.gov.ua/novini/u-nashykh-partneriv/gibressiya-putina-nevoennye-aspekty-vojn-novogo-pokoleniya-fragmenty-issledovaniya-tsentra-globalistiki-strategiya-khkhi-v-ramkakh-proekta-antares-rukov-proekta-m-gonchar-tsentr-globalistiki-strategiya-khkhi-kiev-2016-62-s.html [in Russian].
Gonzalez-Ocantos, E. (2020). Designing Qualitative Research Projects: Notes on Theory Building, Case Selection and Field Research. In L. Curini and R. Franzese Jr. eds. SAGE Handbook of Research Methods in Political Science and International Relations. Thousand Oaks: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526486387
Iskandarjan, A. (2008). Jeskizy novogo status-kvo na Juzhnom Kavkaze [Sketches of a New Status Quo
in the South Caucasus]. In KAVKAZ-2008. Ezhegodnik Instituta Kavkaza [CAUCASUS-2008. Yearbook
of the Caucasus Institute]. Yerevan: Institut Kavkaza, 101-105. https://web.archive.org/web/20240417194316/https://c-i.am/pdf/2008/7.%20Iskandaryan%20-%20Eskizi%20novogo%20status-kvo%20na%20Kavkaze.pdf [in Russian].
Kucera, J. (2013, July 4). Russia Announces Upgrades to CSTO Military Presence in Armenia. Eurasianet. https://web.archive.org/web/20240417185516/https://eurasianet.org/russia-announces-upgrades-to-csto-military-presence-in-armenia
Lamont, K. (2015). Research Methods in International Relations. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Lukyanov, F. (2016, May-June). Putin’s Foreign Policy. Foreign Affairs. https://web.archive.org/web/20240417185905/https://publications.hse.ru/pubs/share/folder/o2pnrpun8x/181859793.pdf
Markedonov, S. (2008). Regional’nye konflikty: perezagruzka [Regional Conflicts: Reset].
Rossija v globalnoj politike [Russia in Global Politics], 5. https://web.archive.org/web/20240417190852/https://www.globalaffairs.ru/articles/regionalnye-konflikty-perezagruzka/ [in Russian].
Markedonov, S. (2018). Russia and the Conflicts in the South Caucasus: Main Approaches, Problems, and Prospects. Caucasus Edition. https://web.archive.org/web/20240417190300/https://caucasusedition.net/russia-and-the-conflicts-in-the-south-caucasus-main-approaches-problems-and-prospects/.
Minasjan, S. (2008). «Pjatidnevnaja vojna» avgusta 2008 g.: voenno-politicheskij analiz [“Five-Day War”
of August 2008: Military-Political Analysis]. In KAVKAZ-2008. Ezhegodnik Instituta Kavkaza
[CAUCASUS-2008. Yearbook of the Caucasus Institute]. Yerevan: Institut Kavkaza. https://web.archive.org/web/20240417191212/https://c-i.am/pdf/2008/8.%20Minasyan%20-%205dnevnaya%20voyna%20-%20voenno-politicheskiy%20analiz.pdf [in Russian].
Peace Agreements Database (2021, January 11). Trilateral Statement of the leaders of Azerbaijan,
Russian Federation and Armenia. The University of Edinburgh. https://web.archive.org/save/https://www.peaceagreements.org/view/2455
Perepelytsia, H. (2003). Henezys konfliktiv na postkomunistychnomu prostori Yevropy [Genesis of Conflicts
in the Post-communist Space of Europe]. Kyiv: Foliant. [in Ukrainian].
Piontkovsky, A. (2012). Ukraina mezhdu Rossiej i ES [Ukraine Between Russia and the EU]. Natsionalna bezpeka i oborona [National Security and Defence Journal], 4/5, 76-78. [in Russian].
Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia. (2023, September 02). Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan’s Interview to Italian La Repubblica Newspaper. https://web.archive.org/web/20240417192941/https://www.primeminister.am/en/interviews-and-press-conferences/item/2023/09/02/Nikol-Pashinyan-interview-La-Republica
Putin, V. (2011). Novyj integracionnyj proekt dlja Evrazii – budushhee, kotoroe rozhdaetsja segodnja
[A New Integration Project for Eurasia is a Future that is Being Born Today]. Evrazijskaja integracija: Jekonomika, pravo, politika [Eurasian Integration: Economics, Law, Politics], 10. [in Russian].
Sushko, O. (2008, August 12). Ukraina – nastupna? [Ukraine – Next?] Ukrainska Pravda [Ukrainian Truth]. https://web.archive.org/web/20240417200013/https://www.pravda.com.ua/articles/2008/08/12/3517426/
[in Ukrainian].
Takahashi, A. R. W. & Araujo, L. (2019). Case Study Research: Opening up Research Opportunities. RAUSP Management Journal, 55(1), 100-111. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-05-2019-0109
Tamkin, E. (2016, November 29). Armenia is Literally Joining Forces with Russia. Foreign Policy. https://web.archive.org/web/20240417200538/https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/11/29/armenia-is-literally-joining-forces-with-russia/
Trenin, D. (2009). «Moskva muskulistaja»: odinochestvo otdelno vzjatogo centra sily [“Muscular Moscow”:
the Loneliness of a Single Center of Power]. Moscow: Carnegie Moscow Center. https://carnegieendowment.org/files/Trenin_Solo_voyage.pdf [in Russian].
Trenin, D. (2012). Post-imperium: evrazijskaja istorija [Post-Imperium: Eurasian History]. Moscow: Russian Political Encyclopedia. [in Russian].
Trenin, D. (2016). Mir ne bez strelby: kak mozhet byt uregulirovan konflikt v Donbasse [The World is not
without Shooting: how the Conflict in Donbass can be Resolved]. Moscow: Carnegie Moscow Center.
[in Russian].
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Designs and Methods. 6th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE.
